i think your opinion to be a right thought. thanks. it's delicious. and thank you.
(i thought this place to be a classroom of a school not an art gallery. i have a friend watch several similar photographs, and the reason is because it wanted to receive as possible much advice...)
I notice that you have a lot of shots of the same subject. Now, the job is to narrow down the shots to the one you like and then remove all the others from your portfolio, I know it sounds harsh, but as someone once said to me: "editing is part of the charm of photography". Here is an instance where all the shots are very good (primula 1,2,3), and it can be tough to limit yourself, but to maximize the effect of this particular plant and photo, it should stand alone in your book (just my opinion). Not that there is anything wrong with the other photos, thats not the case, simply that the other photos, no matter how striking, diminish the effect of the singular, unique piece... I don't know why this is always the case, but I think it has to do with the fact that where a single image is perfect, other images of the same subject, despite being equally perfect, reveal that we as photographers are fallible, that our technique plays a role in the subjects we encounter, and that the strength of one photo might be the weakness of another similar photo.
I should also point out that Van Gogh did 4 versions of "Sunflowers" and they are all perfect... but I find this more the exception to the rule rather than the norm, and photography is a little different from painting.
Another solution for these three photos might be a triptych.
I think this one is the best in the series. Thanks for sharing.
0 
{K:102014} 5/6/2005