|
|
Clifton Jones
{K:10688} 7/2/2005
|
This is excellent....beautiful work.........
Clifton.......
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Collier
{K:19076} 7/2/2005
|
...great image - the composition leave little to be faulted -- as for the jaggies - can't see them on my sceen but - they seem to plauge me in angled lines on my lower resolution images taken with my PS digital - I thing it's just part of the digital life .. K
|
|
|
|
Jeanette Hägglund
{K:59855} 11/29/2004
|
Superb lines. Like it!
:)
Jeanette
|
|
|
|
Thilo Bayer
{K:50358} 8/6/2004
|
Dear Mary,
that's a great Escher tribute =) I really like such images, and this one is so simple but effective... well done! the left side looks like a reflection from the right.
cheers,
thilo
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Sue Hayward
{K:17558} 2/29/2004
|
Thomas, you figured it out! Indeed, I was standing at street level, looking upward at two similar buildings. The 'vertical junction' really is a gap between the light and dark buildings. It is 'away' from you, with the right and left sides of the image being closer to the viewer than the middle part of the image. Also, the light colored building is closer than the darker builing.
Thanks for taking the time to comment!
|
|
|
|
tom rumland
{K:14874} 2/28/2004
|
someone already said 'trippy' so i'm going with escher. as i look at it, it changes perspective on it's own. but after staring at it a bit, i'll say you're looking up at the gap between two similar buildings. the light colored building is the close one. there is no vertical 'junction'. how can i tell? the size and angles of the windows. did i get it?
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Sue Hayward
{K:17558} 2/19/2004
|
Yeppers! Looking up!
|
|
|
|
Alisa Mudge
{K:12511} 2/19/2004
|
This is so trippy! Gotta love images that make you guess where the photog was located.
So, it wasen't from your hotel looking down. It was looking up, while you were waiting for me :)
Alisa
|
|
|
|
|
Beverly Gustafson
{K:1572} 2/16/2004
|
Awesome one Mary Sue! I love the contrast of light and dark while still retaining detail on the dark wall. Where was this taken? SF? The jaggies are no biggie, hardly noticable at all to me. You done good GF!
|
|
|
|
Gerry Pacher
{K:7303} 2/16/2004
|
Dear Mary,
this is a very outstanding shot. I like the contrast, the lines and the crop. Perfect work!
Regards, Gerry
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny K
{K:12635} 2/16/2004
|
Very good composition !! Abstract quality !!!
|
|
|
|
Randy Lorance
{K:24769} 2/16/2004
|
This is a fantastic shot Mary (why not be on long?). Nice optical illusion effect. It is close to me because if it was an inside corner, the light and shadow could not appear as they do.......Randy
|
|
|
|
|
Sven Burkhard
{K:3467} 2/16/2004
|
Great Cityscape picture! I like the lines. Nice light. I like it.
Regards, Sven
|
|
|
|
|
Clifton Jones
{K:10688} 2/16/2004
|
Very nice image..I like this alot...........
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Kinney
{K:1208} 2/15/2004
|
Really nice photo...I like the "darkness" vs "light" compairison...well..thats what I got from it, and it just looks and feels "clean" I really can't describe it...it's just a really nice photo
|
|
|
|
|
Brian T. Ach
{K:1742} 2/15/2004
|
Jaggies=from JPEG compression...don't worry about it...this is a really great shot, and a departure for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Sue Hayward
{K:17558} 2/15/2004
|
The jaggies are when absolutely straight lines look jagged or stair-stepped. When I look at the window sills on the brighter wall, they do not look as smooth as the actual image.
It is probably caused by the way I prepped the image for upload. No biggie :)
|
|
|
|
|
Todd Miller
{K:16464} 2/15/2004
|
what the poop are the jaggies? great shot. can't really tell if the juction is close or not. nice work.
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Sue Hayward
{K:17558} 2/15/2004
|
Don't know why I got the jaggies...the original image does not have them at all. Must have been my resizing?
|
|
0 
